MANAGERIAL BALANCING OF THE MARKETING MIX OF ENTERPRISE COMPETITIVENESS
Abstract
The problem of balancing the parameters of the components of the enterprise competitiveness complex is a condition for achieving competitive development goals that correspond to the main principles of the marketing concept—meeting consumer needs and obtaining economic benefits for enterprises in a competitive market. The distinction between managerial balancing and accounting balancing is clarified. It is shown that the balancing of the marketing complex of enterprise competitiveness combines both the target quantitative equality of the values of its individual components and a certain rational ratio of indicators subordinated to the implementation of current managerial decisions in commodity, personnel, and investment markets in terms of realized, functional, and potential competitiveness. The target concept (criterion) of sectoral balancing of the marketing complex of enterprise competitiveness is defined, which consists in the equality of realized competitiveness values in the commodity, personnel, and investment markets. It is proven that the economic rationale for this balancing is the optimization of enterprise costs for forming realized competitiveness in the main competitive markets of activity. The procedure for achieving the target criterion of realized competitiveness based on forming a dynamic ratio of the status components—potential and functional competitiveness—is described, wherein, given the appropriate potential, the functional component is activated to ensure reaching the basic target model of realized competitiveness. It is emphasized that the primary task of managing the enterprise competitiveness complex under the condition of achieving the target balancing criterion is the mutually reinforcing growth of the parameters of its sectoral components—commodity, personnel, and investment realized competitiveness. It is shown that the management process is subordinated to current and strategic goals, between which temporal contradictions exist. When implementing current competitive goals, it is necessary to ensure the temporary priority of developing certain components of the competitiveness complex, which should later be adjusted according to strategic development tasks. The balancing regime of the competitiveness complex components is defined, whereby the direction of change of the balanced objects corresponds to the dynamic trajectory approaching the target level, and the dynamics' intensity ensures timely achievement of the defined task.
References
Іванова, М., Ткаченко, А., & Загорудько, В. Визначення рівня економічної безпеки, враховуючи конкурентоспроможнсть підприємства. Підприємництво та інновації, № 10, 2019, с. 52-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37320/2415-3583/10.7
Радько В. М., Мацюра С. М. Методичний інструментарій оцінювання конкурентоспроможності підприємства: Наукові інновації та передові технології, № 14(28), 2023, с. 759-767.
Жалдак Г. П., Мамаджанов А. Р. Напрями та методи оцінки рівня конкурентоспроможності підприємств: «Економічний вісник НТУУ "Київський політехнічний інститут"», № 22, 2022, с. 52-59. URL: https://ela.kpi.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/6c2b8ee7-9c25-4b6d-ab30-4ccd9
Lukiewska K., Juchniewicz M. Sustainability (Switzerland), 2021, № 13. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability
Мельник С.М. Проблеми визначення предмету конкуренції як концептуальної основи змісту та видів конкурентоспроможності підприємств: «Вчені записки» №1 (38), 2025, с. 95-111.
Мельник С.М. Методичний інструментарій комплексного оцінювання конкурентоспроможності підприємств: «Бізнес-Навігатор» № 2 (79), 2025, с. 198-204.
Сазерленд Джонатан, Кенуел Дайан. Бухгалтерський облік і фінанси: Ключові поняття / Пер. з англ.; за ред. А.В. Григораш. Дніпропетровськ: Баланс Бізнес Букс, 2005. 400 с.
Kaplan, R., Norton, D. 1996. The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review Jan-Feb, № 70(1), с. 70-81.
Ivanova, M., Tkachenko, A., & Zahorudko, V. (2019) Vyznachennia rivnia ekonomichnoi bezpeky, vrakhuvuiuchy konkurentospromozhnist pidpryiemstva [Determining the level of economic security considering enterprise competitiveness]. Pidpryiemnytstvo ta innovatsii, no. 10, pp. 52–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37320/2415-3583/10.7
Radko, V. M., & Matsyura, S. M. (2023). Metodychnyi instrumentarii otsinky konkurentospromozhnosti pidpryiemstva [Methodological tools for enterprise competitiveness assessment]. Naukovi innovatsii ta peredovi tekhnolohii, no.14(28), pp. 759–767.
Zhaldak, H. P., & Mamadzhanov, A. R. (2022). Napriamy ta metody otsinky rivnia konkurentospromozhnosti pidpryiemstv [Directions and methods for assessing the level of enterprise competitiveness]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk NTUU “Kyivskyi politekhnichnyi instytut”, no. 22, pp. 52–59. Available at: https://ela.kpi.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/6c2b8ee7-9c25-4b6d-ab30-4ccd9
Lukiewska, K., & Juchniewicz, M. (2021). Sustainability (Switzerland), 13. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability
Melnyk, S. M. (2025). Problemy vyznachennia predmetu konkurentsii yak kontseptualnoi osnovy zmistu ta vydiv konkurentospromozhnosti pidpryiemstv (Problems of defining the subject of competition as a conceptual basis for the content and types of enterprise competitiveness). Vcheni zapysky, no. (1)38, pp. 95–111.
Melnyk, S. M. (2025). Metodychnyi instrumentarii kompleksnoho otsiniuvannia konkurentospromozhnosti pidpryiemstv (Methodological tools for comprehensive assessment of enterprise competitiveness). Biznes-Navihator, no. 2(79), pp. 198–204.
Sutherland, J., & Kenwell, D. (2005). Bukhhalterskyi oblik i finansy: Kliuchovi poniattia (Accounting and finance: Key concepts) (A. V. Hryhorash, Ed. & Trans.). Dnipro: Balans Biznes Buks.
Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, no. 70(1), pp. 70–81.

