ECONOMIC INDICATORS OF THE TRANSFORMATION OF BEHAVIORAL MODELS OF LABOR MARKET ACTORS
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to study and systematize the economic interests of the main actors of the labor market, as well as to highlight the economic indicators of the transformation of their behavioral models. In modern economic development, it is imperative to define universal models of individuals that can describe and explain the patterns of their behavior. Each scientific field, based on the accumulated theoretical and practical knowledge, offers its vision of such models. The issue of classification and universalization of behavioral models of individuals is becoming increasingly important in economic science. During the research the following methods were used: the methods of analysis, synthesis, abstraction and logical generalization – to study the economic indicators of the transformation of behavioral models of labor market actors. The economic interests of the main labor market actors (workers, employers, state) are grouped into common interests for all actors and personal (specific) interests. For each of the labor market actors, the directions and economic indicators of determining the level of realization of interests of the labor market actors are separated. The study concluded that rational behavior is not always a behavioral model of labor market actors. It is proved that in the economy there is a gradual transformation of behavioral models under the influence of not only economic indicators, but also intuitive judgments, cognitive distortions, asymmetry of information flows, actions of other individuals, which leads to deviation from the rational model of behavior. The practical significance of the results is that the study of the transformations of behavioral models of labor market actors allows us to predict the occurrence of deviations from a rational model of behavior, to determine the possible results (positive or negative) of such behavior, to assess the level of probability of its existence and the occurrence of these factors in a particular situation, to influence the existing behavioral models of labor market actors and to adjust them to obtain the most optimal behavior model.
References
Беккер Г. Экономический взгляд на жизнь. Мировая экономическая мысль. Сквозь призму веков. Всемирное признание: Лекции нобелевских лауреатов : в 5 т. Т. 5 : в 2-х кн. Кн. 1. Москва : Мысль, 2004. С. 688–706.
Grishnova O., Brintseva O., Cherkasov A. Transition to a new economy: transformation trends in the field of income and salary functions. Problems and Perspectives in Management. 2019. № 17(2). P. 18–31.
Колот А.М., Герасименко О.О. Інститути зайнятості і доходів в новій економіці: глобальні тренди. Проблеми економіки та політичної економії. 2018. № 1. С. 195–235.
Людський розвиток в Україні. Інноваційні види зайнятості та перспективи їх розвитку : колективна монографія / за ред. Е.М. Лібанової ; Ін-т демографії та соціальних досліджень ім. М.В. Птухи НАН України. Київ, 2016. 328 с.
Маршалл А. Принципы политической экономии : в 3-х т. Т. I. Москва : Прогресс, 1983. 416 с.
Шаульська Л.В. Нові риси сфери зайнятості та перспективи її регулювання. Теоретичні і практичні аспекти економіки та інтелектуальної власності. 2015. Вип. 2(1). С. 120–128.
Марущак И.В. Эволюция модели экономического человека в теории человеческого капитала: от homo economicus до homo transactus. Креативная экономика. 2017. №. 8. Т. 11. С. 839–846.
Науменко Т.В., Гринюк А.И. Проблема модели экономического человека в современном научном пространстве. Проблемы современной экономики. 2016. №. 3 (59). С. 39–42.
Bekker G. (2004) Ekonomicheskiy vzglyad na zhizn' [Economic outlook on life]. Mirovaya ekonomicheskaya mysl'. Skvoz' prizmu vekov. Vsemirnoe priznanie: Lektsii nobelevskikh laureatov [World economic thought. Through the prism of centuries. Worldwide Recognition: Lectures of Nobel Laureates]. M.: Mysl' (in Russian).
Grishnova O., Brintseva O., Cherkasov A. (2019) Transition to a new economy: transformation trends in the field of income and salary functions. Problems and Perspectives in Management. Vol. 17 (2). P. 18-31 (in English).
Kolot A. M., Herasymenko O. O. (2018) Instytuty zainiatosti i dokhodiv v novii ekonomitsi: hlobalni trendy [Institutions of employment and income in the new economy: global trends]. Problemy ekonomiky ta politychnoi ekonomii [Problems of economy and political economy]. No.1. P. 195-235 (in Ukrainian).
Libanova E.M. (ed.) (2016) Lyuds'kyy rozvytok v Ukrayini. Innovatsiyni vydy zaynyatosti ta perspektyvy yikh rozvytku [Human development in Ukraine. Innovative types of employment and prospects for their development]. K., In-t demohrafiyi ta sotsial'nykh doslidzhen' im. M.V. Ptukhy NAN Ukrayiny (in Ukrainian).
Marshall A. (1983) Printsipy politicheskoy ekonomii [Principles of Political Economy]. M.: Progress (in Russian).
Shaulska L. V. (2015) Novi rysy sfery zainiatosti ta perspektyvy yii rehuliuvannia [New features of employment sphere and prospects for its regulation]. Teoretychni i praktychni aspekty ekonomiky ta intelektualnoi vlasnosti [Theoretical and practical aspects of economy and intellectual property]. No. 2(1). P. 120-128 (in Ukrainian).
Maruschak I.V. (2017) Evolyutsiya modeli ekonomicheskogo cheloveka v teorii chelovecheskogo kapitala: ot homo economicus do homo transactus [Evolution of the economic man in the theory of human capital: from homo economicus to homo transactus]. Kreativnaya ekonomika [Creative economy]. No 11 (8). P. 839-846 (in Russian).
Naumenko T.V., Grinyuk A.I. (2016) Problema modeli ekonomicheskogo cheloveka v sovremennom nauchnom prostranstve [The problem of the model of an economic person in the modern scientific space]. Problemy sovremennoy ekonomiki [Problems of the modern economy]. No 3 (59). P. 39-42 (in Russian).
