JUSTIFICATION OF VULNERABILITY OF ENTERPRISES WITH WEAK DYNAMICS IN THE CRISIS PERIOD

  • Denys Fomenko Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian National University https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2980-450X
  • Andrii Dimchohlo Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian National University
  • Dmytro Osmak Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian National University
Keywords: crisis period, enterprise, vulnerability, quantitative assessment, qualitative indicators

Abstract

The article substantiated the necessity and relevance of the development of strategies of production organisation in the crisis period for enterprises with weak dynamics, and also noted the main features of such enterprises, due to which they are vulnerable in the crisis period even if the quality of management is close to optimal, because of the peculiarities associated with the main type of production activity. However, the set task of analysing the problems of production organisation at the enterprises with poor dynamics and substantiating the problems of production organisation at the enterprises with poor dynamics. with weak dynamics and justification of their vulnerability in the crisis period due to the peculiarities of production was solved only in terms of qualitative analysis of the crisis impact. crisis impact. For a more detailed study of the mechanism of such influence in order to reduce its consequences for the work of the enterprise with poor dynamics. in order to reduce its consequences for the operation of an enterprise with weak dynamics it is necessary to quantitatively assess the degree of its non-dynamism. In this case it is necessary to analyse more deeply the main signs for the formation of a quantitative parameter for each of them. quantitative parameter for each of them. And then, taking into account the weight of each parameter to form an integral indicator of non-dynamism of enterprises, according to which different enterprises can be compared with each other, making a ranked list of them. their ranked list. It should be borne in mind that different activities of an enterprise will have different indices of non-dynamicity. Therefore, it is necessary to weigh each type of its activity in the integral indicator of the non-dynamicity of the enterprise, distinguishing between the indicator of non-dynamicity of a separate type and the integral indicator of non-dynamicity of the whole enterprise, which is a numerical assessment of all types of activities of the enterprise, taking into account its organisational and economic structure. Thus, this article presents the development of an integral indicator of non-dynamism of the enterprise as a quantitative assessment that allows us to analyse the vulnerability of the enterprise in the crisis period due to its weak dynamics. It is for such enterprises that the developed strategies of production organisation during the crisis period can significantly increase its crisis resistance without significant improvement in the quality of enterprise management.

References

Dolzhanskyi I.Z., Zahorna T.O. (2006) Konkurentospromozhnist pidpryiemstva [Competitiveness of the enterprise]. Navchalnyi posibnyk [textbook]. Kyiv: Center for Educational Literature, 384 p. (in Ukrainian)

Kukharuk A., Zmitrovych D. (2015) Formuvannja konkurentnykh perevagh pidpryjemstva z urakhuvannjam polozhenj koncepciji stalogho rozvytku [Formation of competitive advantages of the enterprise taking into account the provisions of the concept of sustainable development]. Naukovyj visnyk Khersonsjkogho derzhavnogho universytetu. Vol. 15. №. 2. Pp. 46–48. (in Ukrainian)

Novoseletskyi O.M. (2008) Modeliuvannia stiikosti funktsionuvannia pidpryiemstva z urakhuvanniam ryzyku [Modeling the sustainability of the enterprise taking into account the risk]. Avtoreferat dysertatsii [a dissertation abstract]. Kyiv: KNEU, 18 p. (in Ukrainian)

Pakulin S. (2016) Upravlinnja stalym rozvytkom suchasnogho pidpryjemstva [Management of the steady development of a modern enterprise]. Elektronnyj naukovyj zhurnal. №. 8. Pp. 200–217. (in Ukrainian)

Revenko D.S., Dyba V.A. (2014) Intehralni modeli ekonomichnoi stiikosti pidpryiemstva ta instrumentalni zasoby yii vizualizatsii [Integral models of economic sustainability of an enterprise and tools for its visualization]. Visnyk Skhidnoievropeiskoho universytetu ekonomiky ta menedzhmentu, № 1(16), pp. 148–159.

Trydid O.M. (2002) Kompleksna otsinka konkurentnoho statusu pidpryiemstva [Comprehensive assessment of the competitive status of the enterprise]. Ekonomika rozvytku, № 2, pp. 75–76.

Ulianchenko O.V. (2006) Formuvannia ta vykorystannia resursnoho potentsialu v ahrarnii sferi [Formation and use of resource potential in the agricultural sector]: monohrafiya [a monograph]. Kharkiv: KhNAU, 357 p. (in Ukrainian)

Должанський І.З., Загорна Т.О. Конкурентоспроможність підприємства: Навчальний посібник. Київ : Центр навчальної літератури, 2006. 384 с.

Кухарук А., Змітрович Д. Формування конкурентних переваг підприємства з урахуванням положень концепції сталого розвитку. Науковий вісник Херсонського державного університету. 2015. Вип. 15. Ч. 2. С. 46–48.

Новоселецький О.М. Моделювання стійкості функціонування підприємства з урахуванням ризику : автореф. дис. ... канд. екон. наук. Держ. вищ. навч. закл. «Київ. нац. екон. ун-т ім. В. Гетьмана». Київ, 2008. 18 с.

Пакулін С. Управління сталим розвитком сучасного підприємства. Електронний науковий журнал. 2016. № 8. C. 200–217.

Ревенко Д.С., Диба В.А. Інтегральні моделі економічної стійкості підприємства та інструментальні засоби її візуалізації. Вісник Східноєвропейського університету економіки та менеджменту. 2014. № 1(16). С. 148–159.

Тридід О.М. Комплексна оцінка конкурентного статусу підприємства. Економіка розвитку. 2002. № 2. С. 75–76.

Ульянченко О.В. Формування та використання ресурсного потенціалу в аграрній сфері : монографія. Харків : ХНАУ, 2006. 357 с.

Published
2023-05-31
How to Cite
Fomenko, D., Dimchohlo, A., & Osmak, D. (2023). JUSTIFICATION OF VULNERABILITY OF ENTERPRISES WITH WEAK DYNAMICS IN THE CRISIS PERIOD. Entrepreneurship and Innovation, (27), 104-107. https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-3583/27.18