THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF RISK MANAGEMENT FOR ENERGY SECTOR ENTERPRISES
Abstract
In a rapidly evolving energy environment, effective risk management is paramount to ensuring the stability and success of businesses. This article examines a systematic approach to risk management in the energy sector, emphasizing the development of strategies adapted to a specific enterprise.The study delves into the various models used in the energy sector to manage risk. Energy balance models, energy network models, economic-mathematical models, demand and production forecasting models, risk management system models, renewable energy sources (RES) models, and system dynamic models are discussed. The study proposes a comprehensive risk management system for the energy sector, including SWOT analysis, Delphi method, sensitivity analysis and simulation modeling. The approach involves a detailed analysis of internal and external factors, expert assessments and scenario testing for the formulation of adaptive risk management strategies, taking into account regional characteristics, prioritizing resistance to change, aligning them with modern industry challenges. Given the competitive and dynamic nature of the energy sector, the study uses SWOT analysis and the Delphi method as key methodologies. The results of the study emphasize the need for a comprehensive risk management system in energy. A systematic approach combining various analytical methods is proposed, aimed at maximizing sustainability and competitiveness. The decision support system, which can be built on the basis of the developed methodology, will be automatically adapted to specific enterprises, and will facilitate prompt response to changes and optimize risk management strategies. The developed concept of a systemic approach to consideration and response to risks in the energy sector offers a clear path for enterprise risk management. The integrated system proved to be innovative and effective, making a significant contribution to the improvement of risk management methodology in the energy sector. This research provides valuable information for practical applications in energy and risk management.
References
HEFFRON, Raphael, et al. The identification and impact of justice risks to commercial risks in the energy sector: post COVID-19 and for the energy transition. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 2021, 39.4: 439–468.
BURGHERR, Peter; HIRSCHBERG, Stefan. Comparative risk assessment of severe accidents in the energy sector. Energy policy, 2014, 74: S45–S56.
GUNDLACH, Justin. Climate risks are becoming legal liabilities for the energy sector. Nature energy, 2020, 5.2: 94-97.
CONRAD, Björn; KOSTKA, Genia. Chinese investments in Europe's energy sector: Risks and opportunities?. Energy Policy, 2017, 101: 644–648.
RIMŠAITĖ, Laura. Corruption risk mitigation in energy sector: Issues and challenges. Energy Policy, 2019, 125: 260–266.
GALLAGHER, Kevin P., et al. Energizing development finance? The benefits and risks of China's development finance in the global energy sector. Energy policy, 2018, 122: 313–321.
WEIGEL, Paul; FISCHEDICK, Manfred. Review and categorization of digital applications in the energy sector. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9.24: 5350.
ANDREEV, Oleg; LOMAKINA, Oksana; ALEKSANDROVA, Ariadna. Diversification of structural and crisis risks in the energy sector of the ASEAN member countries. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2021, 35: 100655.
SPADA, Matteo; PARASCHIV, Florentina; BURGHERR, Peter. A comparison of risk measures for accidents in the energy sector and their implications on decision-making strategies. Energy, 2018, 154: 277–288.
KERSTE, Marco, et al. Systemic risk in the energy sector—Is there need for financial regulation?. Energy policy, 2015, 78: 22–30.
WEIGEL, Paul; FISCHEDICK, Manfred. Review and categorization of digital applications in the energy sector. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9.24: 5350.
WIECZOREK-KOSMALA, Monika. Weather risk management in energy sector: The Polish case. Energies, 2020, 13.4: 945.
JUNXIA, Liu. Investments in the energy sector of Central Asia: Corruption risk and policy implications. Energy Policy, 2019, 133: 110912.
GATZERT, Nadine; KOSUB, Thomas. Determinants of policy risks of renewable energy investments. International journal of energy sector management, 2017, 11.1: 28–45.
CHECCHI, Arianna; BEHRENS, Arno; EGENHOFER, Christian. Long-term energy security risks for Europe: A sector-specific approach. CEPS, 2009.
FRANC-DĄBROWSKA, Justyna; MĄDRA-SAWICKA, Magdalena; MILEWSKA, Anna. Energy sector risk and cost of capital assessment—companies and investors perspective. Energies, 2021, 14.6: 1613.
SHABALOV, M. Yu, et al. The influence of technological changes in energy efficiency on the infrastructure deterioration in the energy sector. Energy Reports, 2021, 7: 2664–2680.
LU, Jintao, et al. Corporate social responsibility and corruption: Implications for the sustainable energy sector. Sustainability, 2019, 11.15: 4128.
LEISEN, Robin; STEFFEN, Bjarne; WEBER, Christoph. Regulatory risk and the resilience of new sustainable business models in the energy sector. Journal of cleaner production, 2019, 219: 865–878.
DELLERMANN, Dominik; FLIASTER, Alexander; KOLLOCH, Michael. Innovation risk in digital business models: the German energy sector. Journal of Business Strategy, 2017, 38.5: 35–43.
PUZYROVA, Polina; GRECHYSHKIN, Iurii; YERSHOVA, Olena. Risk management concept in innovative activities of modern enterprises. Professional competencies and educational innovations in the knowledge economy, 2020.
BOWERS, John; KHORAKIAN, Alireza. Integrating risk management in the innovation project. European Journal of innovation management, 2014, 17.1: 25–40.
KWAK, Dong-Wook; SEO, Young-Joon; MASON, Robert. Investigating the relationship between supply chain innovation, risk management capabilities and competitive advantage in global supply chains. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2018, 38.1: 2–21.
KRECHOWICZ, Maria. Effective risk management in innovative projects: a case study of the construction of energy-efficient, sustainable building of the laboratory of intelligent building in Cracow. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing, 2017. p. 062006.
DELLERMANN, Dominik; FLIASTER, Alexander; KOLLOCH, Michael. Innovation risk in digital business models: the German energy sector. Journal of Business Strategy, 2017, 38.5: 35–43.
WANG, Juite; LIN, Willie; HUANG, Yu-Hsiang. A performance-oriented risk management framework for innovative R&D projects. Technovation, 2010, 30.11-12: 601–611.
ALI, Ali; WARREN, Derrick; MATHIASSEN, Lars. Cloud-based business services innovation: A risk management model. International Journal of Information Management, 2017, 37.6: 639–649.
BENSAADA, Ilies; TAGHEZOUT, Noria. An enterprise risk management system for SMEs: innovative design paradigm and risk representation model. Small Enterprise Research, 2019, 26.2: 179–206.
POMAZA-PONOMARENKO, Alina, et al. Innovative risk management: identification, assessment and management of risks in the context of innovative project management. Revista de Gestão e Secretariado (Management and Administrative Professional Review), 2023, 14.10: 17314-17335.
SUN, Yingying; BI, Kexin; YIN, Shi. Measuring and integrating risk management into green innovation practices for green manufacturing under the global value chain. Sustainability, 2020, 12.2: 545.
CORONATO, Antonio; CUZZOCREA, Alfredo. An innovative risk assessment methodology for medical information systems. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2020, 34.7: 3095–3110.
DU, Guansan; LIU, Zixian; LU, Haifeng. Application of innovative risk early warning mode under big data technology in Internet credit financial risk assessment. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2021, 386: 113260.
LEISEN, Robin; STEFFEN, Bjarne; WEBER, Christoph. Regulatory risk and the resilience of new sustainable business models in the energy sector. Journal of cleaner production, 2019, 219: 865–878.
NOOTHOUT, Paul, et al. The impact of risks in renewable energy investments and the role of smart policies. DiaCore report, 2016.
DOBLINGER, Claudia; DOWLING, Michael; HELM, Roland. An institutional perspective of public policy and network effects in the renewable energy industry: enablers or disablers of entrepreneurial behaviour and innovation?. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 2016, 28.1-2: 126–156.
CAO, Hongjian; WANG, Bizhe; LI, Ke. Regulatory policy and misallocation: A new perspective based on the productivity effect of cleaner production standards in China's energy firms. Energy Policy, 2021, 152: 112231.
DARNALL, Nicole; WELCH, Eric; CHO, Seongkyung. Sustainable supply chains and regulatory policy. Handbook on the Sustainable Supply Chain. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2019, 513–525.
DURUGBO, Christopher; AMANKWAH‐AMOAH, Joseph. Global sustainability under uncertainty: How do multinationals craft regulatory policies?. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2019, 26.6: 1500–1516.
VAN BENTHEM, Arthur A., et al. The effect of climate risks on the interactions between financial markets and energy companies. Nature Energy, 2022, 7.8: 690–697.
WU, Jianxian; NIE, Xin; WANG, Han. Are policy mixes in energy regulation effective in curbing carbon emissions? Insights from China's energy regulation policies. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2023.
LIU, Baoliu, et al. Toward carbon neutrality: How will environmental regulatory policies affect corporate green innovation?. Economic Analysis and Policy, 2023, 80: 1006–1020.
BRYCH, Vasyl, et al. Management Model of Energy Enterprises Innovative Development Within Physiological Working Conditions. Propósitos y Representaciones, 2021, e1173–e1173.
TODOROV, Georgi N., et al. Modeling energy-efficient consumption at industrial enterprises. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2019, 9.2: 10.
BOROWSKI, Piotr F. New technologies and innovative solutions in the development strategies of energy enterprises. HighTech and innovation Journal, 2020, 1.2: 39–58.
DOBROWOLSKI, Zbysław; SUŁKOWSKI, Łukasz. Business model canvas and energy enterprises. Energies, 2021, 14.21: 7198.
YEMELYANOV, Olexandr, et al. Modeling of parameters of state participation in financing of energy saving projects at enterprises. In: Conference on Computer Science and Information Technologies. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. p. 498–511.
CAILOU, Jiang; DEHAI, Liu. Does venture capital stimulate the innovation of China's new energy enterprises?. Energy, 2022, 244: 122704.
LIN, Boqiang; ZHANG, Aoxiang. Government subsidies, market competition and the TFP of new energy enterprises. Renewable Energy, 2023, 216: 119090.
WANG, Qunwei; FAN, Zining. Green finance and investment behavior of renewable energy enterprises: A case study of China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2023, 87: 102564.
YOU, Yucong; YI, Luxia. A Corpus-based empirical study on energy enterprises digital transformation. Energy Reports, 2021, 7: 198–209.
BRYCH, Vasyl, et al. Factor analysis of financial and economic activities of energy enterprises of Ukraine. In: 2021 11th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT). IEEE, 2021. p. 415–419.
ZAYCHENKO, Irina, et al. Models for predicting damage due to accidents at energy objects and in energy systems of enterprises. In: E3S Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences, 2019. p. 02041.
DU, Weijian, et al. Impact of Energy Market Distortions on the Productivity of Energy Enterprises in China. Energy Journal, 2021, 42.4.
LIU, Pingkuo; WU, Jiahao. Can digital transformation enable the energy enterprises to achieve high-quality development?: An empirical analysis from China. Energy Reports, 2023, 10: 1182–1197.
YU, Shiwei, et al. Determinants of overcapacity in China’s renewable energy industry: Evidence from wind, photovoltaic, and biomass energy enterprises. Energy Economics, 2021, 97: 105056.
BRYCH, Vasyl, et al. Factor modeling of the interaction of agricultural enterprises and enterprises producing green energy to optimize the biomass supply chain. In: 2021 11th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT). IEEE, 2021. p. 424–427.
HUNG, Dang Ngoc; HA, Hoang Thi Viet; BINH, Dang Thai. Impact of accounting information on financial statements to the stock price of the energy enterprises listed on Vietnam’s stock market. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2018, 8.2: 1–6.
LOPES, José Rafael, et al. Energy efficiency improvement in non-intensive energy enterprises: a framework proposal. Energies, 2018, 11.5: 1271.
DU, Weijian; WANG, Faming; LI, Mengjie. Effects of environmental regulation on capacity utilization: Evidence from energy enterprises in China. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 113: 106217.
JIANG, Tingting, et al. Efficiency assessment of green technology innovation of renewable energy enterprises in China: a dynamic data envelopment analysis considering undesirable output. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2021, 23: 1509–1519.
KORDEL, Piotr; WOLNIAK, Radosław. Technology entrepreneurship and the performance of enterprises in the conditions of Covid-19 pandemic: the fuzzy set analysis of waste to energy enterprises in Poland. Energies, 2021, 14.13: 3891.
ZHANG, Hongyi, et al. The Impacts of Resource Endowment, and Environmental Regulations on Sustainability—Empirical Evidence Based on Data from Renewable Energy Enterprises. Energies, 2022, 15.13: 4678.
LIU, Rongyan, et al. Is there any difference in the impact of economic policy uncertainty on the investment of traditional and renewable energy enterprises?–A comparative study based on regulatory effects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 255: 120102.
ZORIČIĆ, Davor, et al. Integrated Risk Analysis of Aggregators: Policy Implications for the Development of the Competitive Aggregator Industry. Energies, 2022, 15.14: 5076.
ATTANASIO, Giovanna; BATTISTELLA, Cinzia; CHIZZOLINI, Elia. The future of energy management: Results of a Delphi panel applied in the case of ports. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 417: 137947.
SCHWEIGER, Gerald, et al. An empirical survey on co-simulation: Promising standards, challenges and research needs. Simulation modelling practice and theory, 2019, 95: 148–163.
SENOVA, Andrea; TOBISOVA, Alica; ROZENBERG, Robert. New Approaches to Project Risk Assessment Utilizing the Monte Carlo Method. Sustainability, 2023, 15.2: 1006.
NEZHNIKOVA, Ekaterina; LARIONOV, Arkadiy; SMIRNOVA, Elena. Ecological risk assessment to substantiate the efficiency of the economy and the organization of construction. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 2021, 27.8: 2069–2079.
AKHAVAN, Mina; SEBT, Mohammad Vahid; AMELI, Mariam. Risk assessment modeling for knowledge based and startup projects based on feasibility studies: A Bayesian network approach. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2021, 222: 106992.
DONG, Jun, et al. Trading performance evaluation for traditional power generation group based on an integrated matter-element extension cloud model. Energy Reports, 2021, 7: 3074–3089.
JAIN, Vineet; AJMERA, Puneeta; DAVIM, João Paulo. SWOT analysis of Industry 4.0 variables using AHP methodology and structural equation modelling. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 2022, 29.7: 2147–2176.
BOURAIMA, Mouhamed Bayane, et al. An integrated intelligent decision support framework for the development of photovoltaic solar power. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 127: 107253.
HERAVI, Gholamreza, et al. Integrating risk management's best practices to estimate deep excavation projects’ time and cost. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 2022, 12.2: 180–204.
ĐALIĆ, Irena, et al. A novel integrated MCDM-SWOT-TOWS model for the strategic decision analysis in transportation company. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 19.3: 401–422.
GOMES, Carlos Francisco Simões; COSTA, Helder Gomes; DE BARROS, Alexandre P. Sensibility analysis of MCDA using prospective in Brazilian energy sector. Journal of Modelling in Management, 2017, 12.3: 475–497.
REŽEK JAMBRAK, Anet, et al. Internet of nonthermal food processing technologies (Iontp): Food industry 4.0 and sustainability. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11.2: 686.
SIKSNELYTE, Indre, et al. An overview of multi-criteria decision-making methods in dealing with sustainable energy development issues. Energies, 2018, 11.10: 2754.
BAHAMID, R. A.; DOH, S. I. A review of risk management process in construction projects of developing countries. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing, 2017. p. 012042.
FOTR, Jiří, et al. Scenarios, their concept, elaboration and application. Baltic Journal of Management, 2015, 10.1: 73–97.
RIGO, Paula Donaduzzi, et al. Renewable energy problems: Exploring the methods to support the decision-making process. Sustainability, 2020, 12.23: 10195.
JISKANI, Izhar Mithal, et al. An integrated fuzzy decision support system for analyzing challenges and pathways to promote green and climate smart mining. Expert Systems with Applications, 2022, 188: 116062.
DAS, Sayan; DE, Sudipta. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats determination and strategy prioritization using hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach for better energy sustainability: Demonstration with Indian data. Energy Conversion and Management, 2023, 281: 116847.
BENJAMIN, Nicolas James. A systematic approach to enterprise risk management. 2015. PhD Thesis. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University.
HAYWOOD, Lorren K., et al. Contextualising risk within enterprise risk management through the application of systems thinking. Environment Systems and Decisions, 2017, 37: 230–240.
BOGODISTOV, Yevgen; WOHLGEMUTH, Veit. Enterprise risk management: a capability-based perspective. The Journal of Risk Finance, 2017, 18.3: 234–251.
DA SILVA ETGES, Ana Paula Beck; CORTIMIGLIA, Marcelo Nogueira. A systematic review of risk management in innovation-oriented firms. Journal of Risk Research, 2019, 22.3: 364–381.
AGUDELO, Mauricio Andrés Latapí; JOHANNSDOTTIR, Lara; DAVIDSDOTTIR, Brynhildur. Drivers that motivate energy companies to be responsible. A systematic literature review of Corporate Social Responsibility in the energy sector. Journal of cleaner production, 2020, 247: 119094.
TAN, Xueping, et al. Measuring risk spillovers between oil and clean energy stocks: Evidence from a systematic framework. Resources Policy, 2021, 74: 102406.
SILVA, Cátia, et al. Demand response performance and uncertainty: A systematic literature review. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2022, 41: 100857.
INGRAM, Tomasz; WIECZOREK-KOSMALA, Monika; HLAVÁČEK, Karel. Organizational Resilience as a Response to the Energy Crisis: Systematic Literature Review. Energies, 2023, 16.2: 702.
ZHANG, Mingming, et al. Is asset securitization an effective means of financing China’s renewable energy enterprises? A systematic overview. Energy Reports, 2023, 9: 859–872.
INGVARSON, Johan; HASSEL, Henrik. On the strength of arguments related to standardization in risk management regulations. Safety science, 2023, 158: 105998.
HOPKIN, Paul. Fundamentals of risk management: understanding, evaluating and implementing effective risk management. Kogan Page Publishers, 2018.
SOUZA, Flávio Sergio Rezende Nunes de, et al. Incorporation of international risk management standards into federal regulations. Revista de Administração Pública, 2020, 54: 59–78.
HUMPHREY, John. Regulation, standards and risk management in the context of globalization. Regulations and International Trade: New Sustainability Challenges for East Asia, 2017, 21–58.
SUBRAMANIAN, Avinash Shankar Rammohan; GUNDERSEN, Truls; ADAMS, Thomas Alan. Modeling and simulation of energy systems: A review. Processes, 2018, 6.12: 238.
WANG, Jing, et al. Literature review on modeling and simulation of energy infrastructures from a resilience perspective. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2019, 183: 360–373.
STROYKOV, G. A., et al. System of Comprehensive Assessment of Project Risks in the Energy Industry. International Journal of Engineering, 2021, 34.7: 1778–1784.
SMAGOWICZ, Justyna, et al. A simulation model of power demand management by manufacturing enterprises under the conditions of energy sector transformation. Energies, 2022, 15.9: 3013.
