A CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF THE GREEN ECONOMY IN THE FRAMEWORK OF GLOBAL SOCIAL GOODS AND SUSTAINABILITY
Abstract
The article emphasizes that in order for the human community to reach the limits of its economic activity, global opportunities for reducing the consumption of non-renewable resources and reducing the anthropogenic burden on the environment must be fully utilized. The author has identified six key models of global development based on scenarios of convergence of its economic and environmental components. Pairs of antagonistic models of eco-economic development formed in the coordinates "level of development – environmental friendliness of innovations" have been analyzed. It has been noted that until now there is a significant time lag between social and economic practice and the results of scientific research in the field of greening of global economic development. The article claims that the transdisciplinary nature of the scientific discourse of sustainable development and green economy has made it possible not only to confirm a number of hypotheses in related fields of knowledge, but also to generate the emergence of a significant number of new theories and concepts. The author considers the concept of global public goods to be one of the successful examples of this. In the context of this concept, institutional features of the development of the green economy and management of the processes of minimizing the negative impact of economic development on the environment have been proposed. The article emphasizes that the concepts of circular, green and bioeconomy are currently widespread in academic circles and occupy a central place in the processes of developing national and corporate strategies and policies, but until now they have been perceiving as identical, without distinguishing the obvious differences between them. Instead, the author argues that in the context of environmental sustainability, the green economy acts as an overarching theory that includes separate structural components of the circular and bioeconomy concepts. In the article a conceptually new vision of the green economy has been offered. It is fundamentally different from the existing author's justification of a qualitatively new subordination hierarchy of key components of the green economy as a basis for ensuring sustainable development while observing the principle of complementarity of author's approaches and previous scientific achievements of other authors.
References
Ekins P., Domenech T., Drummond P., Bleischwitz R., Hughes N., Lotti L. The Circular Economy: What, Why, How and Where. OECD/EC Workshop «Managing environmental and energy transitions for regions and cities», Paris. 5-th July 2019. URL: https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regionaldevelopment/Ekins-2019-Circular-Economy-What-Why-How-Where.pdf
D’Amato D., Droste N., Allen B., Kettunen M., Lähtinen K., Korhonen J., Leskinen P., Matthies B. D., Toppinen A. Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017. Vol. 168. P. 716–734.
Franceschini S., Pansera M. Beyond unsustainable eco-innovation: the role of narratives in the evolution of the lighting sector. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 2015. № 92. P. 69–83.
Gowdy J., Mesner S. The Evolution of Georgescu-Roegen’s Bioeconomics. Review of Social Economy. 1998. Vol. 56. No. 2. P. 136–156.
Innovating for sustainable growth: A bioeconomy for Europe. Report. EU and Governance. URL: https://www.ecsite.eu/activities-and-services/resources/innovating-sustainable-growth-bioeconomy-europe
The Forest Sector in the Green Economy. Geneva Timber and Forest Discussion Papers. UN Economic Commission for Europe December 2011.
Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication. UNEP. Nairobi. URL: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/126GER_synthesis_en.pdf
Geissdoerfer M., Savaget P., Bocken N., Hultink E. J. The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm?’. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017. Vol. 143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
Chin M. What are global public goods? Finance & Development. IMF. December 2021. URL: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/2021/12/Global-Public-Goods-Chin-basics
Impacts of circular economy policies on the labour market. Cambridge Econometrics, Trinomics, and ICF. 2018. URL: https://circulareconomy.europa.eu/platform/sites/default/files/ec_2018_-_impacts_of_circular_economy_policies_on_the_labour_market.pdf
Kirchherr J., Reike D., Hekkert M. Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions’. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2017. Vol. 127. P. 221–232.
Economics of the environment. in Essentials of Economics in Context. By Neva Goodwin, Jonathan M. Harris, Pratistha Joshi Rajkarnikar, Brian Roach, Tim B. Thornton. 1st Edition. Routledge. 2020.
Keith D. A., Ferrer-Paris J. R., Nicholson E., Kingsford R. T., eds. The IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology 2.0: Descriptive profiles for biomes and ecosystem functional groups. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, 2020.
Цифрова економіка: вплив інформаційно-комунікаційних технологій на людський капітал та формування компетентностей майбутнього: монографія / М-во освіти і науки України, ДВНЗ «Київ. нац. екон. ун-т ім. В. Гетьмана»; за ред. Антонюк Л., Ільницького Д., Севастюк А. Київ : КНЕУ, 2021. URL: https://ir.kneu.edu.ua:443/handle/2010/36436
Hidalgo C. A., Hausmann R. The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of National Academy of Science. 2009. Vol. 106 (26). P. 10570–10575.
Mealy P., Teytelboym A. Economic complexity and the green economy. Research Policy. 2020. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733320300287?via%3Dihub
Miedzinski M. Accelerating the Evolution of Climate Innovation Clusters. CLIMATE INNOVATION INSIGHTS. Series 1.3. URL: https://www.climate-kic.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Insight03_Proof4.pdf
Ekins P., Domenech T., Drummond P., Bleischwitz R., Hughes N., Lotti L. (2019) The Circular Economy: What, Why, How and Where. OECD/EC Workshop «Managing environmental and energy transitions for regions and cities», Paris. 5-th July. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regionaldevelopment/Ekins-2019-Circular-Economy-What-Why-How-Where.pdf
D’Amato D., Droste N., Allen B., Kettunen M., Lähtinen K., Korhonen J., Leskinen P., Matthies B. D., Toppinen A. (2017) Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues. Journal of Cleaner Production.Vol. 168. P. 716–734.
Franceschini S., Pansera M. (2015) Beyond unsustainable eco-innovation: the role of narratives in the evolution of the lighting sector. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. №92. P. 69–83.
Gowdy J., Mesner S. (1998) The Evolution of Georgescu-Roegen’s Bioeconomics. Review of Social Economy. Vol. 56. No. 2. P. 136–156.
Innovating for sustainable growth: A bioeconomy for Europe. Report. EU and Governance. Available at: https://www.ecsite.eu/activities-and-services/resources/innovating-sustainable-growth-bioeconomy-europe
The Forest Sector in the Green Economy. (2011) Geneva Timber and Forest Discussion Papers. UN Economic Commission for Europe December.
Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication. UNEP. Nairobi. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/126GER_synthesis_en.pdf
Geissdoerfer M., Savaget P., Bocken N., Hultink E. J. (2017) The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm?’ Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
Chin M. (2021) What are global public goods? Finance & Development. IMF. December Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/2021/12/Global-Public-Goods-Chin-basics
Impacts of circular economy policies on the labour market. (2018) Cambridge Econometrics, Trinomics, and ICF. Available at: https://circulareconomy.europa.eu/platform/sites/default/files/ec_2018_-_impacts_of_circular_economy_policies_on_the_labour_market.pdf
Kirchherr J., Reike D., Hekkert M. (2017) Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions’. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. Vol. 127. P. 221–232.
Economics of the environment. in Essentials of Economics in Context. (2020) By Neva Goodwin, Jonathan M. Harris, Pratistha Joshi Rajkarnikar, Brian Roach, Tim B. Thornton. 1st Edition. Routledge.
Keith D. A., Ferrer-Paris J. R., Nicholson E., Kingsford R. T., eds. (2020) The IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology 2.0: Descriptive profiles for biomes and ecosystem functional groups. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
Tsifrova ekonomika: vpliv informatsiyno-komunikatsiynih tehnologiy na ludskiy kapital ta formuvannia kompetentnostey maybutnyogo: monografia (in Ukrainian) [Digital economy: the impact of information and communication technologies on human capital and the formation of future competencies]: a monograph / edited by Antonyuk L., Ilnytskiy D., Sevastyuk A. (2021) Kyiv: KNEU.
Hidalgo C. A., Hausmann R. (2020) The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of National Academy of Science. 2009. Vol. 106 (26). P. 10570–10575.
Mealy P., Teytelboym A. Economic complexity and the green economy. Research Policy. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733320300287?via%3Dihub
Miedzinski M. (2017) Accelerating the Evolution of Climate Innovation Clusters. CLIMATE INNOVATION INSIGHTS. Series 1.3. Available at: https://www.climate-kic.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Insight03_Proof4.pdf