STRATEGIC MECHANISMS OF FORMING PRODUCT PORTFOLIOS OF COMPANIES IN THE CONDITIONS OF MULTI-VECTOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
Abstract
The relevance of the study is due to the dynamism of the business environment, in which companies simultaneously implement several strategic directions of development, diversify the product offer and actively adapt to changing market conditions. Under such circumstances, traditional approaches to the formation of product portfolios lose their effectiveness, which actualizes the need to create strategic mechanisms that can integrate different business trajectories and ensure portfolio balance in accordance with the long-term goals of the enterprise. The purpose of the study is the theoretical justification and development of strategic mechanisms for the formation of product portfolios of companies operating in a multi-vector business environment. The object of the study is the process of strategic management of the product portfolio, and the subject is the mechanisms and tools for its construction and optimization in accordance with the multi-directional vectors of enterprise development. The methodological tools include systemic and comparative analysis to generalize approaches to product portfolio management, strategic diagnostics using BCG and GE/McKinsey matrices to assess product market positions, as well as elements of value proposition mapping and expert assessments, which allowed us to form an author's mechanism for adapting the portfolio to the conditions of multi-vector business development. The study identified factors influencing the portfolio structure, identified limitations of existing models, and developed a mechanism that ensures the consistency of products with the strategic goals of the enterprise and market changes. The results showed that the implementation of adaptive mechanisms increases the flexibility and stability of companies, optimizes the allocation of resources, and accelerates the response to external challenges, and their use is advisable for enterprises that seek to strengthen their competitive positions and effectively manage product development.
References
Rozvytok tsyfrovizatsiyi obliku, opodatkuvannya, analizu i kontrolyu v upravlinni pidpryyemstvamy : monohrafiya [Development of digitalization of accounting, taxation, analysis and control in enterprise management: monograph]/ R. F. Brukhansʹkyy, P. R. Putsenteylo [ta in.]. Ternopilʹ : VPTS «Universytet·sʹka dumka», 2021. 194 s. URL: https://elar.khmnu.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/13f0ae2a-085e-41f9-9f84-dd67a11e4c8f/content [in Ukrainian]
Yavorsʹkyy R. T., Shyshkovsʹkyy S. V., Tymoshchuk M. R. (2023). Bazovi modeli upravlinnya rozvytkom pidpryyemstva [Basic models of enterprise development management]. Biznes Inform. № 9. S. 282-289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2023-9-282-289 [in Ukrainian]
Hutsul, YU. (2024). Instrumenty upravlinnya innovatsiynym rozvytkom pidpryyemstv v umovakh pislyavoyennoyi vidbudovy natsionalʹnoyi ekonomiky [Tools for managing the innovative development of enterprises in the conditions of post-war reconstruction of the national economy]. Ekonomika ta suspilʹstvo – Economy and Society, (61). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-61-139 [in Ukrainian]
Kinas, I., 2024. Tekhnolohiyi upravlinnya rozvytkom pidpryyemstva v umovakh suchasnosti [Technologies for managing enterprise development in modern conditions]. Naukovi innovatsiyi ta peredovi tekhnolohiyi – Scientific innovations and advanced technologies. 5 (33). DOI: https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-5274-2024-5(33)-771-783 [in Ukrainian]
Yakymenko, YE. YU., & Artemenko, L. P. (2025). Stratehichne upravlinnya konkurentospromozhnistyu pidpryyemstva v umovakh nevyznachenosti [Strategic management of enterprise competitiveness under uncertainty]. Aktualʹni pytannya ekonomichnykh nauk – Current issues in economic sciences, (14). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16899950 [in Ukrainian]
Crisan-Mitra C., Bunduchi R. (2025). Crisis strategies in High-Tech ventures. Journal of Ethics in Entrepreneurship and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEET-05-2025-0028
Lamotte O, Hou S, Durand M. (2025). Inter-organizational governance in nested entrepreneurial ecosystems: lessons from China. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-09-2025-0528
Tanrıverdi Y, Kundakcı N, Ertuğrul İ (2025). International market entry strategy analysis with hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods. Review of International Business and Strategy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-10-2024-0122
Vahonova O., Tryfonova O., Bondar O., Petrukha N., Kyrychenko O., Akimov O. (2022). Economic Justification for Strategic Decisions to Improve the Competitiveness of the Enterprise. AD ALTA. № 2/01-XXVII. P. 198–202. URL: http://www.magnanimitas.cz/ADALTA/120127/papers/A_36.pdf
Gu M, Xie J, Zhang Y, Yang L, Huo B. (2025). Supply chain digitalization and transparency: the privacy calculus perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-06-2025-0834
Omelʹchenko, A. I., Chenusha, O. S. (2022). Innovatsiyni biznesmodeli yak instrument stratehichnoho rozvytku pidpryyemstva [Innovative business models as a tool for strategic development of the enterprise]. Ekonomichnyy visnyk Natsionalʹnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu Ukrayiny «Kyyivsʹkyy politekhnichnyy instytut» – Economic Bulletin of the National Technical University of Ukraine "Kyiv Polytechnic Institute", (21). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20535/2307-5651.21.2022.254847 [in Ukrainian]
Petrukha N., Zhmaiev A., Synkevych M. (2024). Innovative Approaches to it Project Management Using Agile Project and Management Methods. Science and Technology Today. № 8(36). P. 824–839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-6025-2024-8(36)-824-839
Copyright (c) 2026 В. Бернадський

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

